Proton-Beam Therapy Is Not Better Than Traditional Radiation despite Its Higher Cost – Study
In the application of radiation therapy to treat men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer, there is an ongoing debate on whether the latest technology of using proton-beam radiation therapy or the traditional radiation would better help the lot of the patient.
While some experts are rooting for the proton -beam therapy, opponents are of the opinion that the new radiation technology does not benefit patients more than the traditional therapy.
A new study carried out on 30,000 men who are Medicare beneficiaries for radiation treatments has revealed that proton -beam therapy provided no long-term benefit over traditional radiation. The details or findings of the study have been published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
An online article published December 14, 2012 on Fox News reveals some interesting details about the proton-beam therapy, its cost, and comparison with traditional radiation treatment. An excerpt from the article reads:
Proton radiotherapy uses atomic particles to treat cancer rather than X-rays and theoretically can target tumors more precisely. But it requires a particle accelerator roughly the size of a football field that typically costs about $180 million.
Faith in the superiority of proton therapy by some has sparked an arms race among major medical centers. Ten proton accelerators are in operation in the U.S., and nine more are in development, including two by the Mayo Clinic and one by Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and a consortium of other hospitals in New York City.
Ion Beam Applications of Belgium is the leading manufacturer. Others include Hitachi Ltd., Varian Medical Systems Inc. and Mevion Medical Systems Inc.
Critics long have cited proton-beam therapy as a costly new technology with no proven advantage. Medicare pays over $32,000 per patient for proton therapy, compared with under $19,000 for radiation, according to the study.
Moreover, many experts are still debating on the effectiveness of proton-beam therapy over a standard radiation. The main debate has been over the side effects of the two treatments.
Conclusively, the Fox News article reveals: Proton-beam therapy has been the subject of heated debate among urologists, radiation oncologists and health-care cost analysts.
The therapy isn’t considered more effective than standard radiation, or surgery, at stopping the cancer.
And the patient experience is about the same as with standard radiation: Patients typically have daily treatments, Monday through Friday, for approximately eight weeks. Each treatment is painless, and lasts about five minutes.
This HUGE 4+ Year Old Prostate Cancer Victory Authority Website:
(95% of these 1,000+ Prostate Cancer Articles on this website
are written by our Expert In -house Writers, after lots of research.
The remaining 5% are news articles and videos from relevant sources!)
- Proton Beam Therapy and Standard Radiation Therapy – Which Is Better?
- Proton Beam Therapy Treatment for Prostate Cancer
- Prostate Cancer Treatment By Proton Therapy And Cost To Patients
- Prostate Cancer Treatment Florida – Proton Therapy at University of Florida Proton Therapy Institute
- Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
- Prostate Cancer External Beam Radiation Treatment (EBRT)
- Proton Therapy Preserves Quality Of Life for Men with Prostate Cancer – Studies
- Radiation Therapy Candidates for New Investigational Study On Prostate Cancer Treatment
- You Can Survive Aggressive Prostate Cancer With Hormone Therapy And Radiation – New Study Says
- IMRT – The Best Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer Now
- Prostate Brachytherapy And IMRT -Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
- IMRT or Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment for Prostate Cancer
- Prostate Cancer Hormonal Treatment and Radiation Therapy
- Prostate Cancer And Radiation – An Ideal Treatment Option
- Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Prostrate Cancer (IMRT)