Men Who Embrace Multidisciplinary Treatment Team Opt More For Active Surveillance Than Surgery Or Radiation

August 1, 2012 by  
Filed under Prostate Cancer

A new study has revealed that men who are treated by a team of doctors will prefer to go for active surveillance than surgery or radiation for prostate cancer.

This is because the multidisciplinary team will help provide the prostate cancer patient with more balanced view. In this case, the patient will get more facts to make decisions after weighing the risk and side effects of “waiting” and going for immediate surgery or radiation.

Details of this new study conducted from the Massachusetts General Hospital are highlighted below:

Men with low-risk forms of prostate cancer are more likely to opt for so-called active surveillance over surgery or radiation when they have a multidisciplinary team of doctors working with them, according to a new study.

Researchers said that may be because teams with urology, imaging and cancer specialists can provide the most balanced view of the risks and benefits of different options.

Recent studies have suggested that for men who have low-risk cancers, active surveillance – which means bringing the patient back for regular checks but not operating immediately – may be just as effective as going straight to prostate surgery or radiation treatment following a diagnosis

That approach also means patients often avoid the side effects, such as incontinence and impotence, as well as the hefty price tags of unnecessary treatment. Prostate surgery, for instance, typically runs about $13,000.

“For most older men who have low-risk disease, the treatment is not going to change the outcome that we all think about, which is living the rest of their life without being harmed by prostate cancer,” said Dr. H. Ballentine Carter, a urologist from Johns Hopkins Medicine in Baltimore, who wasn’t involved in the new research.

About 240,000 men in the U.S. will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2012, according to the American Cancer Society. More than half of them will have low-risk cancers, which are slow growing and often don’t affect how long a man will live or cause him serious symptoms.

Still, more than nine in 10 men with prostate cancer opt for treatment including surgery or radiation, researchers noted in the new study, published Monday in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

“Many patients who are diagnosed with cancer are over-diagnosed, which means they’re found to have something that doesn’t really pose a threat to their life,” said Dr. Laurence Klotz, head of urology at the Sunnybrook Research Institute in Toronto.

Up to half of all newly-diagnosed prostate cancer patients are candidates for active surveillance, Klotz, who also didn’t work on the new study, told Reuters Health.

“The multidisciplinary groups tend to enhance the degree to which a balanced view is presented to the patient,” Klotz added.

In contrast, urologists seeing a patient alone may recommend the procedure they know best – prostate surgery – whereas radiologists might push for radiation, researchers said.

For the new study, Dr. Jason Efstathiou from Massachusetts General Hospital and his colleagues analyzed treatment choices made by 701 men with low-risk prostate cancer seen at hospitals in Boston.

About one-third of them worked with multidisciplinary teams of doctors, and 43 percent of those patients ended up opting for active surveillance over immediate surgery or radiation. That compared to 22 percent of the men who saw individual practitioners and decided to go with a more conservative approach.

“There is no doubt that different environments could sway men toward different management decisions,” Efstathiou told Reuters Health.

“A multidisciplinary clinic visit allows the patient to hear multiple views regarding their disease and what could be appropriate management choices. We believe that it allows for greater informed decision-making,” he said. Click here to view the full extract.

This study has further emphasized the importance of active surveillance. Many more will want to stick with this watchful waiting so as to avoid the side effects of invasive treatments like surgery and radiation treatments.

Moreover, a multidisciplinary team provides wider opinions for improved decision making. However, there is still need for surgery or radiation treatments if the need arises. Better surgical methods are now available avoid some of the side effects of surgery.

Below Are Other Related Articles Among 1,000+ Prostate Cancer Articles On
This HUGE 4+ Year Old Prostate Cancer Victory Authority Website:

(95% of these 1,000+ Prostate Cancer Articles on this website
are written by our Expert In -house Writers, after lots of research.
The remaining 5% are news articles and videos from relevant sources!)

  1. Surgery for Prostate Cancer Does Not Save Life Than Active Surveillance – New Study
  2. Active Surveillance Saves more Costs than Administering Immediate Treatment for Prostate Cancer
  3. Understanding Active Surveillance or Watchful Waiting in Prostate Cancer
  4. What ALL Men Should Know About Radiation Treatment For Prostate Cancer
  5. Robotic Prostate Surgery Yields Better Survival Rates Than Radiation Treatment – A World-Renowned Prostate Cancer Expert Reports
  6. Here Is Your Medical Team for Prostate Cancer Treatment
  7. Prostate Surgery and Safety in Older Men
  8. Localized Prostate Cancer Treatment – Robot Assisted Surgery Better Than Open Surgery
  9. Early Hormone Therapy Radiation for Men with Prostate Cancer
  10. Radiation Therapy Candidates for New Investigational Study On Prostate Cancer Treatment
  11. Prostrate Cancer Radiation Treatment
  12. Prostate Cancer Radiation Treatment
  13. IMRT – The Best Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer Now
  14. Prostrate Cancer Radiation Treatment – Important Tips
  15. Prostrate Cancer Radiation Treatment

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking... !